Annals of the University of Bucharest
  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Indexing
    • Editorial Team
  • Submissions

Annals of the University of Bucharest

Philosophy series

Menu

The Role of Communist Censorship in Altering Romanian Identity. Case Study: Preserving the Imposed Ideology by Controlling the Past

January 31, 2024 by user2

DANIEL IONICĂ

Abstract

Censorship is one of the most important defense mechanisms of an ideology and the political system within a state. By controlling information sources the censors must ensure the optimal operation of the system they defend. Censorship as a social reality appeared along with the apparition of books, although institutionalized censorship occurred after the invention of printing, which gave rise to the need for such control. Depending on the type of society that created it, censorship can take various forms, from a minimal role in the case of some societies to a leading role in others. Some forms of censorship existed and still exist regardless of the ideological nature of the state we are referring to. In addition to the State’s need to restrict a society’s access to information, similar measures can come from other institutions such as social, religious or economic establishments. After the imposition of the Soviet political model in the countries of Eastern Europe, State imposed censorship marked tight control especially in the first decade of communist power. In the People’s Republic of Romania, as in the other soviet satellite-states, censorship was performed with the intention of blocking certain ideas from the reader, ideas supposed undesirable by a government which feared that its venture to create the new man in a new type of society could be disturbed by disparate forms of dissidence. Censorship in Communist Romania wasn’t only a mean to suppress ideas and retaining its hegemony, but also a way of modeling people into approved templates by the political authority.

AnnalsUnibuc-2018-67-01Ionică

 

Posted in: Articles Tagged: censorship, communism, manipulation, Romania

Issues archive

  • Vol 71 No 2 (2022)
  • Vol 71 No 1 (2022)
  • Vol 70 No 2 (2021)
  • Vol 69 No 2 (2020)

Archive of the journal (1960-2003)

Previous editions of our journal may be read at the following online address.

 

Keywords

aesthetics Aristotle art Augustin autonomy becoming capitalism communism consciousness. cooperation culture cyborg Damasio democracy Descartes despair early modern philosophy Emotions ethics Feel to Know Foucault globalization Heidegger history identity ideology Kant Malebranche metaphysics Pascal person Philokalia philosophical counseling Plato politics posthumanism pragmatism reason Sartre self spirituality Subject transhumanism

Latest articles

  • The Uncomfortable Kuhn. A Revolutionary Reading of Disbelonging: To What Domain Should We Leave the Kuhnian Inheritance?
  • Paradigm and Symbolic Universe: The Enduring Significance of Thomas Kuhn
  • Before Structure. The Rise of Kuhn’s Conceptual Scheme in The Copernican Revolution
  • A Structure for History: Reflections from Kuhn’s Historiographic Studies
  • Kuhn’s Philosophy of History of Science and the Defense of Scientific Rationality

Copyright © 2025 Annals of the University of Bucharest.

Magazine WordPress Theme by themehall.com