MIHAI POPA
Abstract
Cioran, Noica, Eliade or Vulcănescu relate their discourse on history to the categories of some social ontology existing before the history itself. As well as Noica and Eliade (though both will concede to the historic reality a possible meaning retaken in philosophical knowledge), Cioran „avoids” history, not trusting its categories of dynamic, contradictory logic, through a skeptical discourse. For him, the creation does not have a historical fundament, being profoundly subjective, a result of a supra-stimulation offered by the time of prophecy.