Annals of the University of Bucharest
  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Indexing
    • Editorial Team
  • Submissions

Annals of the University of Bucharest

Philosophy series

Menu

Feminism as an Ethical Discourse of Inclusiveness

February 6, 2024 by maria

Henrieta Anișoara Șerban

 

Abstract

This article approaches the feminist discourse as an ethical discourse. The feminist discourse is interpreted as a symptom of the relationship among speech, symbolic power and worldview. Discourse situates people, while emphasizing, if not sustaining, reinforcing, or challenging power structures. The awareness of the connection between speech and action as well as the awareness concerning the power of language to emphasize inequality and marginalization should be manifest in intellectual and in more popular contexts of life, although it is not. Feminist discursive considerations continue to be disregarded as unimportant constituting an intriguing parallel to the general approach of feminist matters, interests and ideals and to women’s affairs in certain carefully adorned social and more personal contexts (for instance, related to harassment, violence and rape). The feminist discourse represents the discourse of autonomy, public presence and dignity of women. However, feminism is not just a discourse, and it is not just one unitary discourse, since it prescribes a paradigm of a specific and very complex worldview (a Gestalt) and the category of women is assumed as being heterogeneous. As an ethical discourse, the feminist discourse aims to transform society. It articulates the emancipation from prescribed social roles, human rights as rights for all humans and as rights to dignity. The study is based on the theoretical perspectives opened by feminist classics such as Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray, as well as on arguments engaged by more recent authors, such as Chantal Mouffe and Mihaela Miroiu. We ground our investigation also on the findings of Pierre Bourdieu in what concerns the relation between language and power. In our (holistic) view, a relevant discussion of feminism cannot approach separately the feminist discourse, the feminist theoretical and political tenants, the feminist worldviews and potential reformation of power structures. In this way, feminism is very close to the postliberalism of Richard Rorty, although it presents specific differences from other postliberal views and liberalism. Feminism, as inclusive ethical discourse, places the accent on a more emphatic worldview where solidarity is based on care (Carol Gilligan) and not on the gratitude of being born a man. As a consequence, this worldview endorses security rights for women in society and at home, the reproduction rights for women and on the equality of opportunity for women and men.

AnnalsUnibuc-2018-02-04Serban

Posted in: Articles Tagged: ethical discourse, feminism, feminist discourse, feminist values, power structures

Issues archive

  • Vol 71 No 2 (2022)
  • Vol 71 No 1 (2022)
  • Vol 70 No 2 (2021)
  • Vol 69 No 2 (2020)

Archive of the journal (1960-2003)

Previous editions of our journal may be read at the following online address.

 

Keywords

aesthetics Aristotle art Augustin autonomy becoming capitalism communism consciousness. cooperation culture cyborg Damasio democracy Descartes despair early modern philosophy Emotions ethics Feel to Know Foucault globalization Heidegger history identity ideology Kant Malebranche metaphysics Pascal person Philokalia philosophical counseling Plato politics posthumanism pragmatism reason Sartre self spirituality Subject transhumanism

Latest articles

  • Vol 73 no 1 (2024)
  • BULGAKOV AND THE JESUS PRAYER
  • LISTENING TO THE GROANING OF MOTHER EARTH. A CHALLENGE AND AN INVITATION TO MOVE BEYOND ECOLOGY, THROUGH ECOFILIA TO ECOSOPHY – THE NECESSITY FOR A RELEVANT SPIRITUALITY TODAY
  • THE SELF-AWARENESS OF “SPIRITUAL” IMAGISTIC PHILOSOPHY
  • THE BEAUTY – FIRST WAY OF KNOWING: SOME GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE ROLE OF THE AESTHETIC IN ACCURATE COGNITION AND IN THE PRACTICE OF CHRISTIAN SPIRITUALITY

Copyright © 2026 Annals of the University of Bucharest.

Magazine WordPress Theme by themehall.com